At
Liverpool’s Walker Art Gallery is the John Moores 2025 open submission painting
biennial, a gathering together of examples of work from the UK’s painterly art
practitioners.
Established
in 1957, it has long since been a mainstay of the British ‘art scene’, priding
itself on being a fairly good indicator of the diverse mutations of
contemporary painting. This 33rd incarnation is the most enjoyable
for some time, a straightforward presentation accommodating for all things flat
and largely rectangular. Reining in that hoary old incarnation ‘painting as
expanded practice’ has paid off.
Artist-makers
in mid-process are pictured in David Caine’s ‘Monstrous Endeavour’, in which a
stern sculptor chips away at a rough stone head, warm grey rubble littering the
studio floor, and in Oscar Grasby’s ‘Portrait Of The Artist’, blue-whites
showing a painter working in his studio on a circular picture of a figure
painting, a sleeping dog adds a bold diagonal, a figure is framed in a distant
doorway. All very meta and self-referential.
With a nod
to unsettled times, nomadic shelters populate surfaces in Joanna Whittle’s
‘Darkened Heart’ and in Deborah Grice’s ‘Safehold’, the use of phosphorescent
paint a bit showy and unnecessary.
The
anonymity of figments and fragments of memory, often mediated by photography
and the digital then transcribed into painting, will always show within
contemporary group exhibitions. There’s the rearing, restrained attack dog
balanced with a narrow column of fleshy hand spread acrylics in Colin
Crumplin’s large, unbalanced diptych ‘Dog’, an outsourced family portrait
fabricated in China in Jamie Holman’s ‘In Every Dream Home A Heartache’ (the
hooded father figure emphasising the makers anonymity undercutting much
contemporary work).
The
potential intimacy of surface materials shows in the crumpled white of Katy
Shepherd’s ‘Bedscape’ and Stig Evan’s ‘000022-286’, painted grey rectangles of
folded vintage toilet paper reflattened for window-mounted presentation.
More
aggressively tangible, Eleanor Barlett’s ‘Mother Matter’ shows the stubborn
presentness of physical stuff, Molly Thomson’s ‘Proposition’ has angular creamy
flat off-cuts constructing a different kind of solidity. At the overtly
painterly end of the spectrum in Louise Evan’s small ‘Frayed At The Sides’ lumpen
troughs of the real stuff of paint fan in muddied warm oranges across a wooden
support.
The
dematerialisation of the image, a milky fading of image and form also gets a
look-in, the fogged perception of a Reinhardt or Rothko in Tom Chamberlain’s
‘Come What May’ or the skeleton of a potential interior painting in Shaan
Syed’s two-panel oil on linen ‘The Judge’s Quarters: Facing West’, an
architect-style drawing of an old court-room now converted into a restaurant.
It seems like a blankly functional statement of blue lines but niggles
seductively.
Particularly
successful as a visual brain-worm of muted oddness is Evan Thomas’s ‘Souvenir
(After Chardin)’, a small canvas peppered with unfocussed transcriptions of a
floral design lifted from a Chardin still life.
Within a painting, to be visible is to be inert, passive: a static
almost-object for contemplation. A painting can also operate as a shallow ghost-box
carrying intimations or iterations of spectres of solidity, of things departed
or about to arrive. The surface acts as a buffering screen commanding a
viewer’s wait time and impatience, eating time whilst momentarily compacting
potentially contradictory spaces.
Ally Fallon’s winning entry ‘If You Were Certain, What Would You Do
Then?’ accommodates for all these facts in an enjoyably pithy way. Colourful
but restrained, an implied simple interior space constructed from rectangular
areas presenting the different ways paint as a material can be applied to a
surface.
It presents ambient washes and bleeds of colour, a hovering rectangle of
an off-white crawl of looping paint, a suggestion of a pale decorative base or
floor area with a cartoonish Lovecraftian tentacles moving in from stage left.
A darkly humorous nod towards the infective needling surface crawl of colour
that patterns areas of the painting – all presented at a scale smaller than the
often bombastically large entries which tend to bully space for the viewers’
attention.
For Fallon, the simple pleasure of building the visual is proposed, a
playful opposition to the nostalgic melancholia ingrained in an automatic
acceptance of a more regular and traditional picture space. It’s a
straightforward reminder of paintings unique ability to fold and ossify
movement and time.
The works success is in the way it tangles complicated propositions in a
delightfully exuberant display of the liveliness of painting as practice.
Awarding a prize for best painting always feels strangely wrong but, if
it has to happen, this year the jury have made an intelligently considered choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment